Friday, 19 June 2009

Food for thought from a virgin grazer


I was out with my new friend Jason Smith at Jyoti's on Wednesday (we're planning to set up a Birmingham Salon in conjunction with the Institute of Ideas). Because Jason reads a lot about food, I mentioned the craze that's been sweeping Talis for some time now - namely Graze. For the uninitiated, it's a service delivering a daily box of healthy snacks that costs about £3 a day. I told him that my colleague Grant White started subscribing at the beginning of this week, and that I was monitoring him carefully to see whether he survived the vertiginous drop of food intake.

By coincidence, our colleague Zach Beauvais went off on leave the following day, and forgot to cancel his Graze subscription. So he kindly emailed me and invited me to treat myself to the contents of his Graze box. I'd brought in food for that day so I saved the box for today.
I was pretty nervous, I don't mind admitting, at the thought of surviving a whole working day on only three slices of pineapple, a small portion of "fire nuts" and an even smaller portion of cashew nuts. For good measure, I took along a small banana and a raspberry yogurt to supplement what seemed like a draconian quantity of food.
For breakfast I had what I always have - two boiled eggs and a glass of cloudy apple juice. I had the banana at about 10, and around that time I started eating the fire nuts, about two at a time. By 13:50, I'd finished the fire nuts and eaten 1 of the 3 slices of pineapple. I was stunned to report to my best friend Sandra, who's taking quite an interest in this experiment, that I was feeling completely full and wouldn't be able to eat a thing for the next hour at least.

So it's now 17:15. The pineapple is now gone but most of the cashew nuts remain uneaten. And the yogurt's still in the fridge.

My usual habit is to eat a banana at around 10. Then at 12 I have a (home-made) tortilla wrap containing iceberg lettuce, red onion, red pepper, rather a lot of Pizza Express salad dressing and tuna. By 16:00 I tend to be pretty ravenous and eat a yogurt to try to stave off a trip upstairs to the Talis staff tuck shop for the ever-tempting packet of Walkers crisp.

This previously vocal cynic of the whole Graze thing is starting to get impressed. I'm only slightly hungry, so I'm probably going to tuck into the yogurt. I might take the nuts to the pub.

Dave and I are having an austerity year - saving up to do everything that needs to be done around the house. Hence the home-made lunches. It's simply not an option to spend £3 a day on an ongoing basis. However, going down the Graze route for a month before our trip to France, land of eternally skinny women, is starting to look attractive. Would I spend £60 to lose half a stone before my holiday? This "pleasantly plump" Angl0-Saxon 40-something wouldn't hesitate.

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

100 Spanish-speaking writers choose the 100 books that changed their lives

Last year I, in common with other Talis employees, posted a list of 100 important novels. This time I'm posting another list which is similar but different. It too is a list of books, but this one is of interest because it reveals to me how Anglocentric I can be in my reading. Maybe other people will experience a similar realisation when they read this list and will broaden their cultural horizons as a result. That could only be a good thing. It was published in El Pais magazine last August. I generally score highly in this kind of list, as I'm quite well read. I also speak fluent Spanish. And yet I've only read 18 of them and a good few I'd never even heard of. It's always good to be jolted out of complacency. I accept that the list has a strong European bias.
1. Don Quixote de la Mancha - Miguel de Cervantes
2. In search of lost time - Marcel Proust
3. The Odyssey - Homer
4. The trial - Franz Kafka
5. Metamorphosis - Franz Kafka
6. Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy
7. Moby Dick - Herman Melville
8. Selected stories - Anton Chekhov
9. War and peace - Leo Tolstoy
10 - Fictions - Jorge Luis Borges
11. Poet in New York - Federico Garcia Lorca
12. The brothers Karamazov - Fyodor Dostoevsky
13. Crime and punishment - Fyodor Dostoevsky
14. The bible
15. The magic mountain - Thomas Mann
16. Pedro Paramo - Juan Rulfo
17. Ulysses - James Joyce
18. The sound and the fury - William Faulkner
19. Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert
20. 1001 Arabian nights
21. Under the volcano - Malcolm Lowry
22. The death of Virgil - Hermann Broch
23. Essays - Michel Montaigne
24. Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov
25. The red and the black - Stendhal
26. The Aleph - Jorge Borges
27. Tristram Shandy - Laurence Sterne
28. The heart is a lonely hunter - Carson McCullers
29. Heart of darkness - Joseph Conrad
30. The flowers of evil - Charles Baudelaire
31. The banquet - Plato
32. Catcher in the rye - J.D. Salinger
33. A sentimental education - Gustave Flaubert
34. Duino elegies - Rainer Maria Rilke
35. Rhymes and legends - Gustavo Adolfo Becquer
36. This business of living - Cesare Pavese
37. The book of disquiet - Fernando Pessoa
38. Complete works - Jorge Luis Borges
39. Thus spoke Zarathustra - Friedrich Nietzche
40. Treasure Island - Robert Louis Stevenson
41. Rayuela - Julio Cortazar
42. Fortunata and Jacinta - Benito Perez Galdos
43. Extraordinary stories - Edgar Allan Poe
44. The city and the dogs - Mario Vargas Llosa
45. The waste land - T.S.Eliot
46. Metamorphoses - Ovid
47. Poems - Emily Dickinson
48. King Lear - William Shakespeare
49. Hamlet - William Shakespeare
50. Trilce - Cesar Vallejo
51. The outsider - Albert Camus
52. Absalom, Absalom! - William Faulkner
53. Odes - Horace
54. The long goodbye - Raymond Chandler
55. The idiot - Fyodor Dostoevsky
56. The shipyard - Juan Carlos Onetti
57. The first man - Albert Camus
58. The maker - Jorge Luis Borges
59 100 years of solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
60. The divine comedy - Dante Alighieri
61. La Regenta - Leopoldo Alas Clarin
62. The waves - Virginia Woolf
63. As I lay dying - William Faulkner
64. The diaries of Franz Kafka
65. Celestina - Fernando de Rojas
66. Richard The Third - William Shakespeare
67. Residence on Earth - Pablo Neruda
68. Demian - Hermann Hesse
69. Doctor Jekyll and Mr Hyde - Robert Louis Stevenson
70. Conversation in the cathedral - Mario Vargas Llosa
71. Pride and prejudice - Jane Austen
72. The leopard - Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa
73. Lord Jim - Joseph Conrad
74. Lazarillo de Tormes - Anonymous
75. Journey to the end of the night - Louis Ferdinand Celine
76. Canto General - Pablo Neruda
77. The Iliad - Homer
78. Bohemian lights - Ramon Maria del Valle-Inclan
79. The war of the end of the world - Mario Vargas Llosa
80. Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll
81. Aphorisms - G.C. Lichtenberg
82. The Communist Manifesto - Karl Marx
83. Mortal and Rose - Francisco Umbral
84. Dubliners - James Joyce
85. The Great Gatsby - F. Scott Fitzgerald
86. Peter Pan - James Matthew Barrie
87. Sonnets - Quevedo
88. Aunt Julia and the scriptwriter - Maria Vargas Llosa
89. David Copperfield - Charles Dickens
90. The Alexandria quartet - Lawrence Durrell
91. The fall - Albert Camus
92. Orlando - Virginia Woolf
93. The unconsoled - Kazuo Ishiguro
94. Time and space - Juan Ramon Jimenez
95. The Master and Margarita - Mikhail Bulgakov
96. The garden of the Finzi-Contini - Giorgio Bassani
97. The wild palms - William Faulkner
98. Stone and country - Gabriel Aresti
99. Complete works - Pio Baroja
100. The second sex - Simone de Beauvoir

Sunday, 5 April 2009

Our Friends in the North

Months ago my colleague Karen Reece lent me the DVD of Our Friends in the North and it languished on my shelf for so long that I had to email her at one point to reassure her that I hadn't appropriated it. I knew I was going to love it but Dave had to be convinced (he has occasional laggard tendencies - not that I can talk: OFITN was first shown back in 1996!). A few days ago we got around to watching the first episode, and Dave pronounced himself "completely hooked" within the first 10 minutes. On Friday we watched the second episode before we went out (as a result we didn't leave the house until 10.30pm), and then came home early, an hour later to watch the third episode, maybe pissing off some of our social circle in the process.

Our Friends in the North is one of those TV dramas to which the term "landmark" is routinely applied. The story centres on four friends whom we first see in Newcastle in the prime of their youth as they make choices that will influence the rest of their lives. The first three episodes, which as I say we've now seen, take place in the 1960s, switching between Newcastle and London as we follow the lives of the main characters (acted by four now household names -Daniel Craig, Gina McKee, Christopher Eccleston and Mark Strong). The story will continue right up to 1995, giving it an impressive historical scope as well as a compelling narrative.

Dave and I are both well into our 40s now so "retro" is often stuff that we can remember from first time around. The first episode, then, set in 1964, made us feel really young because I hadn't been born and Dave was only 3, and as a result, the cultural references mean very little to us. This is a good thing, not least because the kind of cheesy quality that has become commonplace in depictions of the 1960s, and (especially) the 1970s, is entirely absent.

The four friends are still living in their family terraced houses in 1964; the brother of Mary (Gina McKee) is mentally and physically disabled, but whereas in the first episode he's cheerful and chatty in the family living room, by the second episode (1966), he's become so ill as a result of living in Mary's damp high-rise flat, that he's unable to speak or even raise a smile. For some reason, this has really lingered with me, and has made me reflect on the bumpy road to progress that the British working class endured in the 20th century. Indeed, at least part of the success of the drama can be attributed to a tightly integrated socio-economic backdrop to the story which is extremely well realised and apparently so accurate in its representation of real historical figures that there was a strong possibility of litigation.

We tend to cariacature the 1960s as a golden era of promise and prosperity, but in fact my Dad's family were living in housing that was more appropriate to the 19th century than the second half of the 20th (my Dad's words not mine). My parents bought a house in Radcliffe, Lancashire just before they married in 1963. They didn't move in until after the wedding (because you didn't then) so at the weekends, Dad used to go over and do DIY and decorate the place on his own. I remember him telling me of the joy with which he'd run a bath before going home, and lie in his own bath, finally able to control his own hot and cod water taps and stay in there as long as he liked. He and his family had never had a bath in their own home, and at the family's weekly visit to the public baths had always had to ask the attendant for more hot water. Years later, I dated a musician who was quite a bit older than me, and he told me what a great experience he'd had going to a public bath and having to ask for hot water. I remember thinking - you middle class twat. See "Common People" by Pulp for further details.

At the beginning of the 1970s, my Nana, who had recently become widowed, moved from 16 Johnson Street in Lower Broughton, Salford, to a newly constructed high rise called Greyfriars Court. I personally remember this as a very happy period. Nana was in a first floor flat with a balcony, and it seemed that every Sunday afternoon when we went over to visit, there was something new in the flat, often the kind of cheap ornament that kids love. It occurs to me now, watching OFITN, that some lessons might have been learnt from the Newcastle experience, as Nana, to my knowledge, never had any damp or structural problems in her flat.

So Nana's move always felt like progress to me, but I was too young to know how happy or otherwise my Nana (or indeed the rest of the family) felt about it, and that leads me in a roundabout way to another impressive quality of OFITN, namely that it's rarely clear-cut in its observations. Mary is extremely bright and is starting a university course in 1964, but by 1966 she's married with a child to Tosker (Mark Strong). Just when you're thinking how trapped and compromised she is in an empty marriage, there's a powerfully scene in which genuine love is revealed. Following 4 characters over a period of 3 decades gives ample scope to explore the nuances and ambiguities of the finely drawn characters and their relationships.

We can't wait to watch the rest of it, and if you've never seen it, try and borrow Karen's copy!

Sunday, 15 March 2009

Flasher at large

After a chore-packed morning I logged onto Twitter to be confronted by multiple tweets proclaiming how beautiful the day was. Everyone seemed to be outdoors except me. So after lunch, a little neighbourhood walk with Dave was in order.

We can only have been five minutes into the walk, and we were already ambling along the River Cole, which we're lucky enough to have at the bottom of our road. As we approached Sarehole Mill (see pic), we were jolted out of our mid-afternoon reverie by some sort of fracas between a couple of men on the other side of the "river" (at the risk of compromising my neighbourhood pride, it's really more like a stream - I think I jumped it once when I was out running). My initial impression, as I focused on the situation at hand, was that they might be drunk, but in any case there was something so aggressive about the situation that I was immediately ill at ease. I smiled one of those smiles that says please don't involve me in your drama and prepared to move on, but Dave had already started to engage with them. On our side of the river there wasn't just me and Dave - there was also a family of about 6 children with their mother. I was sure that at least two of the children were laughing. I turned to the men. One of the men, who was holding the other man down, told Dave, in the midst of a seemingly unstoppable rant, that the other man had been flashing his penis to the children, but was defending himself by claiming that he was actually taking a piss. He was clearly a paedophile, the man said (ranted). Dave calmly asked whether the police had been called, to which the answer was yes. When I looked back at the children, I realised that two of them were crying their eyes out, and as their Mum moved them on, they called out to their Dad, the ranter on the other side of the river.

We passed the mill and crossed over the road, and then before we proceeded with the rest of the walk, Dave stopped and went into self-doubt mode. "Have you got your phone on you?" he asked. Neither of us had brought our phones out. It's a new sort of downturn thing with me that I delight in leaving the house with as few possessions (generally money but other stuff as well) as possible. We wondered whether the man had really phoned the police. We agonised, like the couple of middle class liberals that we are, as to whether we should go back and confront the situation. We worried that the man was going to beat the living crap out of the suspected paedophile.

Above all, however, we questioned whether the man really was the paedophile he was accused of being. He looked like a middle-aged homeless man who might well have been relieving himself after an afternoon of drinking. On the other hand, it could have been more sinister. We waited for a while but the police didn't turn up, for whatever reason.

When I was little, one of my friends was a girl called Katie Warford and she lived on Church Lane in Ashton-on-Mersey. She would delight in recounting to me that the old man in the big house down the road would stand at his front door every Sunday morning and expose himself to all the church-goers passing by. We both thought it was hilarious. We were 10.

Thinking back then to this afternoon's incident, was it really the flasher that had upset those children, or was it in fact the angry reaction of their father and the intensely disruptive effect it was having on an otherwise playful and harmonious afternoon? Does the media's treatment of paedophilia prevent us from taking a measured approach, and in turn, is this causing children even more harm on top of problem itself (horrific though the problem unquestionably is)?

Dave and I copped out of the situation in the end. I argued that I had enough problems of my own without taking on someone else's as well - a position I've pretty much maintained since I intervened in an argument at a party when I was 21 and by some miracle survived the vicious assault that ensued.

Thursday, 1 January 2009

My Top 10 experiences of 2008


Along the lines of what Dave and I do every New Year's Eve, here's my favourite experiences of the year, in no particular order...
1. Re-establishing contact with my Spanish friends (lived in Santiago de Compostela in 1985) by bumping into Karen (see pic, second left) in the Modus Vivendi bar, Santiago. Thanks to Dave for giving me the space to catch up properly, and a special mention to Tito (aka Andres Pineiro on left) for travelling from El Ferrol with a day's notice to see me. I was so happy that I sat in the cathedral one day and cried. Also on the picture - Carlos.
2. Seeing David Tennant play Hamlet (my favourite play) at Stratford-upon-Avon, October, with Sandra.
3. My presentation at the ER&L Conference, Atlanta, is a resounding success, in March. Plus I make friends with the indomitable Christine Orr and we dine at Mary Mac's Tea Room - truly a unique experience.
4. The highlight of my first trip to New York at Easter with Dave is drinking cocktails at the Flat Iron Lounge, an Art Deco extravaganza.
5. Sandra and I throw a fantastic party in the room above Patrick Kavanagh pub, Kings Heath, in October. Jo, Alistair and Bill all stay over.
6. Dave and I become very good friends with our neighbours Andy and Helen over the course of the year. One particular highlight is the neighbourhood barbecue in our communal back lane in August.
7. Another great year for the national schools competition, Debating Matters. As inspiring and energising as ever.
8. My headaches become manageable for the first time in 15 years.
9. I run the 10K Great Manchester Run effortlessly in May, and enjoy the whole experience.
10. Dave and I have a fab time at Fiona's 40th in September (see previous post), staying out until 4.30am with Fiona and her friends Ros and Ben.

Friday, 12 December 2008

Manchester says No to congestion charge

Given that I'm a highly opinionated person, I express surprisingly few of my opinions on this blog. But I'm going to make an exception in this instance. Today I'm pretty proud to be a Mancunian, even though I knew really that the congestion charge vote would go to a No as I didn't know a single Mancunian who was voting in favour.

Some of the comments in the Guardian demonstrate the kind of contempt for the views of ordinary people that I've come to expect from this government. One very astutely draws parallel with the Irish referendum over the summer that rejected the European Lisbon treaty and as a result drew ugly responses negating the validity of democratic mechanisms when you don't get the result you want. Responses along the lines of "those ungrateful Irish after all that Europe has done for them" and "we'll carry on run the vote again until we get the right result" are not guaranteed to bring universal harmony across national and social divides any time soon. However, they're extremely likely to bring out the inner rebel in quite a lot of people, certainly those with any self-respect.
I don't agree with people who are saying, albeit sympathetically, that it's about reluctance to vote for extra taxes at the start of an economic downturn. And it's certainly not true that the No vote is a vote against public transport; Mancunians are justly proud of their tram system. I really think it's about people getting fed up of being told what to think (where was the No campaign, for example?), and that is a good thing, surely, for everyone, no matter where they live.

Thursday, 11 December 2008

Thai green fish curry

Way back in October, Rob Styles tagged me to get me to blog a recipe. It's a token of the esteem that I hold for Rob that I'm prepared do divulge my favourite and most admired recipe.

So here's how you make the best Thai green fish curry ever, for 2-3 people. It's on the soupy side, and it's fragrant and flavoursome rather than red hot. But that's the way I like it.

Besides the fact that it tastes great and everyone loves it, the beauty of this recipe is that you can make the paste well in advance, and then the rest of the curry can be made in a matter of minutes.
Ingredients for the paste:

2 stalks of lemon grass finely chopped
3 hot green chillis, deseeded and finely chopped
2 cloves garlic, peeled and chopped
1 thumb-sized piece of ginger, peeled and chopped
1 shallot peeled and finely chopped
Half a 15g pack of fresh coriander, leaves only
Half a level teaspoon of ground cumin
Half a level teaspoon of ground coriander
1 tablespoon of lime juice
1 tablespoon of nam pla (Thai fish sauce)
Half a level teaspoon of ground black peppercorns

Ingredients for the curry:
500g haddock fillets, skinned, cut into wide pieces
200g bag of frozen, cooked and peeled extra large prawns
1 tablespoon of groundnut oil
250ml coconut milk
250ml fish stock
8 lime leaves
15g fresh basil, leaves only, torn
Half a 15g pack of fresh coriander, leaves only, torn

Method:
Put all the paste ingredients into a food processor and blitz into a rough paste, stopping to scrape down sides with rubber spatula as necessary.
Fry paste in the oil for 1-2 minutes, stirring so it doesn't colour.
Pour in coconut milk and add stock, lime leaves, haddock and prawns.
Simmer until fish starts to turn opaque, stirring regularly so the sauce doesn't catch - 7-8 minutes.
Add basil and coriander leaves. Check seasoning.
Remove lime leaves before serving.